Case Review Form

      * Denotes required field.

      Title

      * First Name

      * Last Name

      * Email Address

      * Phone Number

      Cell Phone Number

      Office Phone Number

      Street Address

      Apartment/Suite

      City

      State

      Zip Code

      Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

      Date of birth of injured person
      (mm-dd-yyyy):

      Name of drug:

      Date you started taking the drug (mm-yyyy):

      Date you stopped taking the drug (mm-yyyy):

      Please describe any side effects:

      Other Info:

      No Yes, I agree to the Parker & Waichman LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

      Yes, I would like to receive the Parker & Waichman LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

      please do not fill out the field below.

Actos Whistleblower Claims She was Preventing from Reporting Bladder Cancer to FDA

Filed March 28th, 2012 Laurie

A whistleblower case involving a former Takeda Pharmaceuticals medical reviewer has been opened by U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor. Dr. Helen Ge was a safety consultant to the company’s pharmacovigilance division. Part of Ge’s job was to reverse the adverse events of drugs in order to identify and evaluate safety signals for the diabetes drug Actos.

According to the lawsuit, Ge had direct knowledge of an increased risk of bladder cancer associated with the medication. When she attempted to report the risk, she was met with resistance from her superiors. Over 100 cases of bladder cancers related to Actos were reported to the company, but only 72 were reported to the FDA. Ge said the discrepancy was a serious one.

Takeda also failed to accurately report to regulators hundreds of cases of heart failure associated with Actos. The lawsuit claims the company failed to classify “non-hospitalized or non- fatal” congestive heart failure cases as serious from late 2007 to January 2010, and supervisors directed the whistleblower to change her “related” assessment to unrelated.

“Takeda’s motivation to fraudulently report and under-report the serious adverse events was driven by an economic desire to falsely enhance Actos’s safety profile and to increase sales,” Ge said. Taketa was allegedly intent on marketing Actos as being safer than GlaxoSmithKline’s diabetes drug, Avandia and wanted to downplay data pointing to a link between Actos and bladder cancer.

Be Sociable, Share!

Comments are closed.

Click Here Now, to Have an Attorney Answer Your
Medicinal Drug Injuries Questions
No Cost - No Obligation!